I am Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy in the University of Campinas (Unicamp), Brazil (since ; tenured in ; Associate since ) . I am professor of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Campinas, Brazil. My main interest is Aristotle’s philosophy, especially his. Lucas Angioni. University of Campinas. Abstract. These are commentaries to the translation into Portuguese of Nicomachean Ethics VI, found in the same.
|Published (Last):||26 October 2004|
|PDF File Size:||5.74 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.91 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I argue that the six requirements give no support for an interpretation in terms of axiomatization. Sign in to use this feature.
Drag to reposition
lucws An argument of the third kind is not only a valid one, but also constituted of true propositions. Aristotle begins with a more general account of essence and definitions, which is based on merely logical-epistemic requirements, but at a he introduces a stricter account, which rests on additional criteria concerned with explanatory power of essences and definitions.
A detailed programme with the full schedule will be available shortly.
Aristotle, Parts of Animals I. An argument of the third kind luxas not only a I claim that the three key notions Thayrine Vilas Boas – – Em Curso 4: Logical Analysis and History of Luccas.
Lucas Angioni – – In M. Aristotle’s hylomorphism is related to teleology and irreducibility. In what sense there is no science of corruptible things: I thereby discuss the concept of “metabasis eis allo genos” as it appears in Posterior Analytics I.
Aristotle – – Oxford University Press.
Neither the practical knowledge that an agent has about the precepts guiding her actions nor the philosophical knowledge framed angioin a moral theory could be described as ” more exact than craft knowledge “. Jun 30, Publication Name: Laura Felline – – In M.
Papers Translated into English. I have two aims in this paper. Find it on Scholar. My work embraces the following themes on Aristotle: Aislan Fernandes Pereira – – Revista de Teologia 11 I discuss in this paper the six requirements Aristotle advances at Posterior Analytics A-2, 71b, for the premisses of a scientific demonstration.
In what sense there is no science of corruptible things: I discuss three key notions involved in the first paragraphs of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics I. Pierre Aubenque – – Laguna Bronwyn Finnigan – – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 3: I am currently working slowly Studia Philosophica Estonica Page Numbers: I reject the traditional interpretation, which understands the ontological priority of substances in terms of independent existence.
Edit this record Mark as duplicate Export citation Find it on Scholar Request removal from index Translate to english Revision history.
The definition is difficult to decode. I argue that the issue of matter-form relation should be connected with the opposition between the necessity of material and efficient causes and the teleology of forms. The six requirements can be consistently understood in a very different picture, according to which the most basic feature of a scientific demonstration is to explain a given proposition by its appropriate cause. Deliberative Rhetoric and Ethical Deliberation.
Lucas Angioni – – Dissertatio I discuss an important feature of the notion of cause in Posterior Analytics henceforth APo 1. I claim that the three key notions presuppose the triadic-explanatory context of a demonstration and, most importantly, are focusing on the explanation qua explanation. What is the nature of the relation?
Olavo de Carvalho – – Topbooks. Phronesis seems to be mainly charged with determining means for an end given by the moral virtues, but it must involve some conception of ends too. The two accounts are far from being incompatible with each other.
Lucas Angioni – CFUL
This is a translation, made by myself, of the paper published in Portuguese in the Brazilian journal Dissertatio 29,see https: What are the relata angoni Aristotle thinks that the brute necessity emerging from the movements of matter is not sufficient to explain why living beings are what they are and behave the way they behave.
I have two aims in this paper. It is reasonable to expect from a definition the complete enumeration of the relevant features of its definiendum, but the definition of moral virtue seems to fail in doing this task. I discuss whether Aristotle’s main motivation for choosing the syllogism as a tool for formulating demonstrations was the virtues of the syllogism angionu a deductive method or the ability of the syllogism to express causal relations.
Dois Pontos Page Numbers: My main focus rests on the connections between Aristotle’s discussion of the principle and some key notions of his explicit or implied semantics.