The Prince is a 16th-century political treatise by the Yet Machiavelli is keenly aware of the fact that an earlier pro-republican coup had been thwarted by the people’s. Le Prince de Machiavel Rsum La Philosophie Le Prince doit toujours s attirer la sympathie du peuple et s appuyer sur les puissants Aim et craint la fois, le. Her third husband was the French spy Thomas Pichon. Le Prince de Machiavel Rsum La Philosophie Le Prince doit toujours s attirer la sympathie du peuple et.

Author: Gotaur Kazrataxe
Country: New Zealand
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 21 April 2005
Pages: 459
PDF File Size: 4.72 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.40 Mb
ISBN: 811-4-20345-150-4
Downloads: 33248
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazigor

One of the most important early works dedicated to criticism of Machiavelli, especially The Princewas that of the HuguenotInnocent GentilletDiscourse against Machiavellicommonly also referred to as Anti Machiavelpublished in Geneva in He believes they are useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined, cowardly, and without any loyalty, being motivated only by money. Diderot thought it was a df. In the first sentence Machiavelli uses the word ” state ” Italian stato which could also mean ” status ” in order to neutrally cover “all forms of organization of supreme political power, whether republican or princely”.

That great men should develop and use their virtue maachiavel prudence was a traditional theme of advice to Christian princes. If a prince is overly generous to his subjects, Machiavelli asserts he will not be appreciated, and will only cause greed for more. Title page of a edition. Internal fears exist inside his kingdom and focus on his subjects, Machiavelli warns to be suspicious of everyone when hostile attitudes emerge.

Xenophon however, like Plato and Aristotle, was a follower of Socratesand his works show approval of a ” teleological argument “, while Machiavelli rejected such arguments.

The Prince – Wikipedia

He has to resort to malevolent measures to satisfy the nobles. The Italian Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci argued that Machiavelli’s audience for this work was not the classes who already rule or have “hegemony” over the common people, but the common people themselves, trying to establish a new hegemony, and making Machiavelli the first “Italian Jacobin “.

A prince must have the wisdom to recognize good advice from bad. Above all, Machiavelli argues, a prince should not interfere with the property of their subjects, their women, or the life of somebody without proper fsum.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Machiavelli also warns against using auxiliary forces, troops borrowed from an ally, because if they win, the employer is under their favor and if they lose, he is ruined.


Differences of opinion amongst commentators revolve around whether this sub-text was intended to be rusm, let alone understood as deliberately satirical or comic.

404 Error – Page Not Found!

Therefore, a prince should not break his word unnecessarily. Machiavelli says this required “inhuman cruelty” which he refers to as a virtue. The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophyespecially modern political philosophyin which the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal.

After first mentioning that a new prince can quickly become as respected as a hereditary one, Machiavelli says princes in Italy who had longstanding power and lost it cannot blame bad luck, but should blame their own indolence. Using fortresses can be a good plan, but Machiavelli says he shall “blame anyone who, trusting in fortresses, thinks little of being hated by the people”. Machiavelli took it for granted that would-be leaders naturally aim at glory or machiavep.

He who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin than his preservation. Although he was not always mentioned machiwvel name as an inspiration, due to his controversy, he is also thought to have been an influence for other major philosophers, such as Montaigne[49] Descartes[50] HobbesLocke [51] and Montesquieu.

So secure was his power that he could afford to absent himself to go off on military campaigns in Africa.

A principality is not the only outcome possible from these appetites, because it can also lead to either “liberty” or “license”. So in another break with tradition, he treated not only stability, but also radical innovationas possible aims of a prince in a political community. Scipio’s men, on the other hand, were known for their mutiny and dissension, due to Scipio’s “excessive mercy” — which was however a source of glory because he lived in a republic.

Princes who fail to do this, who hesitate in their ruthlessness, find that their problems mushroom over time and they are forced to commit wicked deeds throughout their reign. However, a prince that relies solely on fortifications or on the help of others and stands on the defensive is not self-sufficient. According to Machiavelli, when a prince comes to power through luck or the blessings of powerful figures within the regime, he typically has an easy time gaining power but a hard time keeping it thereafter, because his power is dependent on his benefactors’ goodwill.

Shklar “Montesquieu and the new republicanism” in Bock The Prince starts by describing the subject matter it will handle. The descriptions within The Prince have the general theme of accepting that the aims of princes — such as glory and survival — can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends: Wikiquote has quotations related to: If the prince does not have the first type of intelligence, he should at the very least have the second type.


Machiavelli divides the subject of new states into two types, “mixed” cases and purely new states. Men have imagined republics and principalities that never really existed at all. In some cases the old king of the conquered kingdom depended on his lords. The fear instilled should never be excessive, for that could be dangerous to the prince. He does not command the loyalty of the armies and officials that maintain his authority, and these can be withdrawn from him at a whim. Only armed prophets, like Moses, succeed in bringing lasting change.

This makes it an ideal text for Machiavelli to have used.

According to Machiavelli, these are relatively easy to maintain, once founded. Each of the following chapters presents a discussion about a particular virtue or vice that a prince might have, and is therefore structured in a way which appears like traditional advice for a prince.

A prince cannot truly have these qualities because at times it is necessary to act against them. As shown by his letter of dedication, Machiavelli’s work eventually came to be dedicated to Lorenzo di Piero de’ Medicimachaivel of ” Lorenzo the Magnificent rsym, and a member ,e the ruling Florentine Medici family, whose uncle Giovanni became Pope Leo X in This results in higher taxes, and will bring grief upon the prince.

If a prince is given to changing his mind, his reputation will suffer. Unlike Cicero’s more widely accepted works however, according to Cox When the kingdom revolves around the king, with everyone else his servant, then it is difficult to enter but easy to hold.

He believes that by taking this profession a ruler will be able to protect his kingdom. By contrast, machiwvel who can benefit from the new order will be less fierce in their support, because the new order is unfamiliar and they are not certain it will live up to its promises.